2018 XCSP3 competition: mini-solvers track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-20-30-00_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-20-30-00_c18.xml
MD5SUM22e303206e5b0ea869a7ab153bbd8d22
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark104
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark302.882
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints21
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size20
Maximum domain size32
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":20,"count":20},{"size":32,"count":20}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":20},{"degree":3,"count":20}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity20
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":20},{"arity":20,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints20
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":20},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
SuperSolver_Macq_Stevenart 2018-04-27 (incomplete)4300473SAT104 302.882 300.339
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4300468SAT (TO)104 2519.68 2520.01
Solver of Xavier Schul & Yvhan Smal 2018-04-28 (incomplete)4300472SAT (TO)104 2520.03 2478.52
GG's minicp 2018-04-29 (complete)4300469SAT (TO)104 2520.03 2509.13
The dodo solver 2018-04-29 (complete)4300474SAT (TO)104 2520.08 2516.32
MiniCPFever 2018-04-29 (complete)4300470SAT (TO)104 2520.1 2490.22
slowpoke 2018-04-29 (incomplete)4300471SAT (TO)114 2520.04 2511.41

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 104
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> c[0] c[1] c[2] c[3] c[4] c[5] c[6] c[7] c[8] c[9] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] d[0]
d[1] d[2] d[3] d[4] d[5] d[6] d[7] d[8] d[9] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[15] d[16] d[17] d[18] d[19] </list> <values> 7 4 1 0 2 3 5 6 8
10 12 9 11 18 19 17 16 14 13 15 8 4 7 2 2 4 6 8 4 6 7 5 7 12 4 4 3 1 1 9 </values> </instantiation>