2018 XCSP3 competition: mini-solvers track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-30-30-00_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-30-30-00_c18.xml
MD5SUMb8130450ecaa214ac0617b692471aec1
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark126
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark302.917
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables60
Number of constraints31
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size30
Maximum domain size32
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":30,"count":30},{"size":32,"count":30}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":30},{"degree":3,"count":30}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity30
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":30},{"arity":30,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints30
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":30},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
SuperSolver_Macq_Stevenart 2018-04-27 (incomplete)4300438SAT126 302.917 300.372
MiniCPFever 2018-04-29 (complete)4300435SAT (TO)126 2520.09 2488.42
The dodo solver 2018-04-29 (complete)4300439SAT (TO)126 2520.11 2515.82
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4300433SAT (TO)132 2519.94 2520.01
GG's minicp 2018-04-29 (complete)4300434SAT (TO)142 2520.1 2500.71
slowpoke 2018-04-29 (incomplete)4300436SAT (TO)171 2520.06 2512.03
Solver of Xavier Schul & Yvhan Smal 2018-04-28 (incomplete)4300437SAT (TO)175 2520.02 2478.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 126
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> c[0] c[1] c[2] c[3] c[4] c[5] c[6] c[7] c[8] c[9] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] c[20]
c[21] c[22] c[23] c[24] c[25] c[26] c[27] c[28] c[29] d[0] d[1] d[2] d[3] d[4] d[5] d[6] d[7] d[8] d[9] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[15]
d[16] d[17] d[18] d[19] d[20] d[21] d[22] d[23] d[24] d[25] d[26] d[27] d[28] d[29] </list> <values> 6 1 0 2 4 5 10 11 7 8 3 9 12 15 14 17
19 16 18 27 29 28 25 23 24 26 22 20 21 13 4 7 2 1 2 4 1 6 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 5 7 12 3 2 4 1 5 3 1 1 9 8 </values> </instantiation>