PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900567024--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900567024--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM7129b2638275c1b1b14ce0a3da71735e
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark12
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark15.2207
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints927
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45360
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45359
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 755
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109899OPTIMUM 15.2207 15.223
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109896OPTIMUM 22.2106 21.0021
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109898OPTIMUM 35.0747 35.0811
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109897OPTIMUM 56.7444 55.4906

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 12
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 x8 x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 x33 -x34 x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227
-x228 -x229 -x230 -x231