PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900565534--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900565534--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMa432251fbe239eaf75ee6653ab14d833
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark20.4549
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints892
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45060
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45059
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 685
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109868OPTIMUM 11.63 10.5078
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109869OPTIMUM 20.2519 27.6629
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109871OPTIMUM 20.4549 20.4623
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109870OPTIMUM 51.9331 51.9512

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 x191 -x192 -x193 x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 x226 -x227 -x228 -x229
-x230 -x231