PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900551864--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900551864--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMc0a37f516cf4d2739ccd6d05a55220be
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.17591
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints906
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 44801
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 44800
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 687
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109795OPTIMUM 7.17591 7.1769
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109792OPTIMUM 9.52455 8.28202
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109793OPTIMUM 13.403 28.1071
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109794OPTIMUM 21.7407 21.7443

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 x130 -x131 x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 x230 -x231