PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900567135--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900567135--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM32795eb517f73910564f73a4c3c20f9d
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark16.0246
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints904
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 44120
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 44119
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 761
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090572OPTIMUM 15.5316 13.8022
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094730OPTIMUM 16.0246 16.0266
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091958OPTIMUM 31.8662 34.7096
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093344OPTIMUM 43.9593 43.9666

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 x230 -x231