PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900548667--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900548667--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMb80542b6ea011406c368e0a53be4d6f1
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark80.7397
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1804
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 90822
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 90821
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 625
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109692OPTIMUM 50.6363 48.6286
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109695OPTIMUM 80.7397 80.7531
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109693OPTIMUM 85.901 57.4165
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109694OPTIMUM 1686.61 1686.95

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 x171 -x172 -x173 x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 x220 -x221 x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 -x229
-x230 -x231