PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900564824--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900564824--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMbcc83dde29b6f868056a0bfa1b1372de
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark19
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark14.6498
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints928
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 47257
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 47256
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 813
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109663OPTIMUM 14.6498 14.6518
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109660OPTIMUM 18.6412 16.7936
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109661OPTIMUM 31.9291 29.6396
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109662OPTIMUM 34.0598 34.0648

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 19
Solution found:
x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 x43 -x44 -x45 x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227
-x228 -x229 -x230 -x231