PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110968094--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110968094--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM3614e30d545cc7450a6dcbc158864418
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark17
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.07692
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints29
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1556
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 1555
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1242
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109623OPTIMUM 7.07692 7.0788
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109620OPTIMUM 10.5514 9.18834
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109621OPTIMUM 15.1417 32.2713
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109622OPTIMUM 23.8614 23.866

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 17
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111
-x112 -x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134
-x135 -x136 -x137 x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157
-x158 -x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 x167 -x168 -x169