PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111220546--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111220546--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM33073796b90256de3fa5d24843165564
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark69
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark9.8775
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints28
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1415
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 98
Sum of constraints costs 1414
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1248
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109540OPTIMUM 8.94264 7.60338
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109543OPTIMUM 9.8775 9.88006
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109541OPTIMUM 15.5616 22.3573
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109542OPTIMUM 39.7939 39.8022

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 69
Solution found:
-x1 x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111
-x112 -x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134
-x135 -x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157
-x158 -x159 -x160 x161 x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169