PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111219799--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111219799--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMdce35c207127a4ac706b019c5103970d
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark4
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.16821
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints64
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 3426
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 99
Sum of constraints costs 3425
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1258
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109283OPTIMUM 5.16821 5.17122
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109280OPTIMUM 12.2431 10.7911
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109281OPTIMUM 21.8817 34.3466
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109282OPTIMUM 24.5413 24.5481

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 4
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111
-x112 -x113 -x114 x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169