PB'12 competition: satisfaction and optimization track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryOPT-BIGINT-LIN (optimisation, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark18641903
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1800.72
Has Objective FunctionYES
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the objective function
Optimality of the best value was proved
Number of variables1000400
Total number of constraints2000307
Number of constraints which are clauses980300
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)7
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1020000
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint4950
Number of terms in the objective function 29800
Biggest coefficient in the objective function 165469149
Number of bits for the biggest coefficient in the objective function 28
Sum of the numbers in the objective function 179144885896
Number of bits of the sum of numbers in the objective function 38
Biggest number in a constraint 165469149
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 28
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 179144885896
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers38
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
SAT 4j PB RES // CP 2.3.2 Snapshot (complete)3689984SAT (TO) 1800.72 903.089
PB11: Sat4j Res//CP 2.3.0 (complete)3743838SAT (TO) 1800.73 920.192
Sat 4j PB Resolution 2.3.2 Snapshot (complete)3689985SAT (TO) 1800.8 1791.69
PB10: SAT4J PB RES // CP 2.2.0 2010-05-31 (complete)3743836? 388.12 379.185
npSolver 1.0 (fixed) (complete)3750138? (problem) 127.175 361.983
npSolver inc-topDown (fixed) (complete)3746946? (problem) 127.435 361.906
npSolver inc-topdown-quickBound (fixed) (complete)3751734? (problem) 127.61 400.562
npSolver inc (fixed) (complete)3748542? (problem) 127.842 426.307
toysat 2012-05-17 (complete)3706505? (exit code) 49.2275 49.2556
npSolver inc (complete)3699385? (MO) 127.49 130.665
npSolver inc-topDown (complete)3697789? (MO) 127.81 135.547
npSolver 1.0 (complete)3700981? (MO) 130.8 130.938
npSolver inc-topdown-quickBound (complete)3702577? (MO) 132.56 326.021
pb2sat 2012-05-19 (complete)3696193? (TO) 1800 1800.32
pb2satCp2 2012-05-19 (complete)3694597? (TO) 1800.01 1800.42
PB12: minisatp 1.0-2-g022594c (complete)3723282? (TO) 1800.01 1800.41
SAT4J PB specific settings 2.3.2 snapshot (complete)3710433? (TO) 1800.03 1791.75
PB07: minisat+ 1.14 (complete)3722355? (TO) 1800.06 1800.62
PB07: SAT4JPseudoResolution 2007-03-23 (complete)3743834? (TO) 1800.1 1727.03
toysat 2012-06-01 (complete)3724878? (TO) 1800.15 1800.54
PB10: SCIPspx SCIP with SoPlex 1.4.2 (CVS Version 30.5.2010) as LP solver (complete)3743837? (TO) 1800.28 1800.56
PB09: SAT4J Pseudo Resolution 2.1.1 (complete)3743835? (TO) 1801.12 1649.13
PB07: bsolo 3.0.17 (complete)3743833Signal 1440.98 1612.36

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 18641903
Solution found:
--too large--