PB'12 competition: satisfaction and optimization track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryOPT-BIGINT-LIN (optimisation, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark-83387
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1800.75
Has Objective FunctionYES
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the objective function
Optimality of the best value was proved
Number of variables399113
Total number of constraints400980
Number of constraints which are clauses399002
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)1977
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint397089
Number of terms in the objective function 272557
Biggest coefficient in the objective function 10946
Number of bits for the biggest coefficient in the objective function 14
Sum of the numbers in the objective function 904013696
Number of bits of the sum of numbers in the objective function 30
Biggest number in a constraint 10946
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 14
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 904013696
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers30
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
PB09: SAT4J Pseudo Resolution 2.1.1 (complete)3743715SAT (TO)-83387 1800.75 1795.45
PB07: SAT4JPseudoResolution 2007-03-23 (complete)3743714SAT (TO)-48952 1804.08 1798.33
PB07: bsolo 3.0.17 (complete)3743713SAT (TO)-23668 1800.19 1800.49
SAT4J PB specific settings 2.3.2 snapshot (complete)3710346SAT (TO)-14894 1800.29 1792.37
pb2satCp2 2012-05-19 (complete)3694510? (problem) 3.83042 9.54182
pb2sat 2012-05-19 (complete)3696106? (problem) 3.87941 5.77879
npSolver inc (complete)3699298? (problem) 3.9574 8.89351
npSolver 1.0 (complete)3700894? (problem) 3.97639 7.43164
npSolver inc-topDown (complete)3697702? (problem) 4.01139 8.32625
npSolver inc-topdown-quickBound (complete)3702490? (problem) 4.10738 5.96943
npSolver inc-topdown-quickBound (fixed) (complete)3751647? (problem) 4.68529 22.6997
npSolver inc (fixed) (complete)3748455? (problem) 4.83826 13.4835
npSolver inc-topDown (fixed) (complete)3746859? (problem) 4.94225 17.9686
npSolver 1.0 (fixed) (complete)3750051? (problem) 4.98424 14.3785
PB12: minisatp 1.0-2-g022594c (complete)3723195? (exit code) 2.57161 17.297
toysat 2012-05-17 (complete)3706418? (exit code) 17.5433 17.548
toysat 2012-06-01 (complete)3724791? (TO) 1800.05 1800.41
PB10: SAT4J PB RES // CP 2.2.0 2010-05-31 (complete)3743716? (TO) 1800.09 902.427
PB11: Sat4j Res//CP 2.3.0 (complete)3743718? (TO) 1800.12 903.845
SAT 4j PB RES // CP 2.3.2 Snapshot (complete)3689944? (TO) 1800.6 905.746
Sat 4j PB Resolution 2.3.2 Snapshot (complete)3689945? (TO) 1800.62 1795.74
PB10: SCIPspx SCIP with SoPlex 1.4.2 (CVS Version 30.5.2010) as LP solver (complete)3743717? (TO) 1802.24 1802.55
PB07: minisat+ 1.14 (complete)3722335Signal 35.6176 44.4631

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: -83387
Solution found:
--too large--