PB'10 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/celar/
normalized-celar7-sub1-20_wcsp.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/celar/
normalized-celar7-sub1-20_wcsp.wbo
MD5SUM8392c6f9a9c070c17f5e6e6f3dfa2fdc
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMSAT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark152646
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1800.06
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables280
Total number of constraints49254
Number of soft constraints49240
Number of constraints which are clauses49240
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)14
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints0
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint20
Top cost 38275680
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 1000000
Sum of constraints costs 3660538699
Biggest number in a constraint 1
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 1
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 21
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers5
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PB/CT 0.1 fixed (complete)2701269MSAT (TO) 1800.06 1800.02
PB/CT 0.1 (complete)2701267MSAT (TO) 1800.07 1800.02
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.1 (complete)2701268MSAT (TO) 1800.26 1796.6
SAT4J PB CuttingPlanes 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701265Wrong UNSAT 3.44248 1.51178
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701264Wrong UNSAT 5.15921 3.28218
SAT4J PB RES // CP 2.2.0 2010-05-31 (complete)2701266Wrong UNSAT 7.14691 4.10803

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 152646
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227
-x228 -x229 -x230 -x231 -x232 -x233 -x234 -x235 -x236 -x237 -x238 -x239 x240 -x241 -x242 -x243 -x244 -x245 -x246 -x247 -x248 -x249 -x250
-x251 -x252 -x253 -x254 -x255 -x256 -x257 -x258 -x259 x260 -x261 x262 -x263 -x264 -x265 -x266 -x267 -x268 -x269 -x270 -x271 -x272 -x273
-x274 -x275 -x276 -x277 -x278 -x279 -x280