2017 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
BusScheduling/BusScheduling-cnt-s1/
BusScheduling-cnt-t1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameBusScheduling/BusScheduling-cnt-s1/
BusScheduling-cnt-t1.xml
MD5SUM0e22a2954fbf957e92bc2f9155ed2e18
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark7
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.014852
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables77
Number of constraints24
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size2
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":77}]
Minimum variable degree3
Maximum variable degree6
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":3,"count":7},{"degree":4,"count":26},{"degree":5,"count":41},{"degree":6,"count":3}]
Minimum constraint arity5
Maximum constraint arity20
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":5,"count":1},{"arity":6,"count":3},{"arity":7,"count":2},{"arity":8,"count":3},{"arity":9,"count":3},{"arity":10,"count":1},{"arity":11,"count":1},{"arity":13,"count":3},{"arity":14,"count":1},{"arity":16,"count":1},{"arity":17,"count":1},{"arity":18,"count":1},{"arity":19,"count":2},{"arity":20,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"count","count":24}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4268553OPT7 0.014852 0.015629999
cosoco 1.1 (complete)4258430OPT7 0.015492 0.12847599
cosoco-sat 1.12 (complete)4266622OPT7 0.019094 0.020293999
Mistral-2.0 2017-07-28 (complete)4258927OPT7 0.022279 0.130382
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-18) (complete)4282773OPT7 1.03339 0.52006203
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-07-26) (complete)4253957OPT7 1.03506 0.60828298
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-09) (complete)4270023OPT7 1.05489 0.639296
AbsCon-basic 2017-06-11 (complete)4257436OPT7 1.21382 0.74236602
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2017-07-26 (complete)4255945OPT7 1.31999 0.90325099
OscaR - Hybrid 2017-07-26 (complete)4256442OPT7 1.32454 1.1648099
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-07-26) (complete)4254454OPT7 1.56787 0.72618097
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-18) (complete)4281303OPT7 1.5706199 0.61710101
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-09) (complete)4271493OPT7 1.5801001 0.61770999
sat4j-CSP 2017-07-05 (complete)4257933OPT7 1.61145 0.99519497
choco-solver 5a (2017-08-18) (complete)4284243OPT7 1.8227299 0.74637097
choco-solver 5a (2017-07-26) (complete)4254951OPT7 1.89972 0.98083901
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-07-26 (complete)4256939OPT7 3.16275 1.80427
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-08-22 (complete)4285713OPT7 3.2421 1.34552
Concrete 3.4 (complete)4259424OPT7 7.65978 3.7590001
OscaR - ALNS 2017-07-26 (complete)4255448SAT (TO)7 246.64999 240.015

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 7
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='-7'> <list>x[0] x[10] x[11] x[12] x[13] x[14] x[15] x[16] x[17] x[18] x[19] x[1] x[20] x[21] x[22]
x[23] x[24] x[25] x[26] x[27] x[28] x[29] x[2] x[30] x[31] x[32] x[33] x[34] x[35] x[36] x[37] x[38] x[39] x[3] x[40] x[41] x[42] x[43]
x[44] x[45] x[46] x[47] x[48] x[49] x[4] x[50] x[51] x[52] x[53] x[54] x[55] x[56] x[57] x[58] x[59] x[5] x[60] x[61] x[62] x[63] x[64]
x[65] x[66] x[67] x[68] x[69] x[6] x[70] x[71] x[72] x[73] x[74] x[75] x[76] x[7] x[8] x[9] </list> <values>0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 </values>
</instantiation>