2017 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GolombRuler/GolombRuler-a4-s1/
GolombRuler-12-a4.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGolombRuler/GolombRuler-a4-s1/
GolombRuler-12-a4.xml
MD5SUM72e40c8851280ca3f4afc7fa1ebce33e
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT TO
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark91
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark247.715
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables12
Number of constraints1927
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size501
Maximum domain size501
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":501,"count":12}]
Minimum variable degree606
Maximum variable degree607
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":606,"count":10},{"degree":607,"count":2}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity12
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":1},{"arity":3,"count":440},{"arity":4,"count":1485},{"arity":12,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints1926
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":1926},{"type":"ordered","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
OscaR - ALNS 2017-07-26 (complete)4255522SAT (TO)91 247.715 240.017
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-08-22 (complete)4285770SAT (TO)91 266.841 252.02901
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-07-26 (complete)4257013SAT (TO)92 266.02802 252.039
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2017-07-26 (complete)4256019SAT (TO)94 243.716 240.019
OscaR - Hybrid 2017-07-26 (complete)4256516SAT (TO)94 248.186 240.026
Concrete 3.4 (complete)4259498SAT (TO)94 258.83899 240.035
cosoco-sat 1.12 (complete)4266679SAT (TO)95 251.886 252.02299
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4268610SAT (TO)95 251.88901 252.011
cosoco 1.1 (complete)4258504SAT (TO)95 251.938 252.01801
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-18) (complete)4281360SAT (TO)96 1594.58 252.119
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-09) (complete)4271550SAT (TO)100 1666.59 252.10699
AbsCon-basic 2017-06-11 (complete)4257510SAT (TO)103 243.603 240.01199
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-09) (complete)4270080SAT (TO)105 243.66299 240.05
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-07-26) (complete)4254031SAT (TO)105 244.41 240.03
Mistral-2.0 2017-07-28 (complete)4259001SAT (TO)105 251.90401 252.01199
choco-solver 5a (2017-07-26) (complete)4255025SAT (TO)108 251.996 240.01601
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-18) (complete)4282830SAT (TO)109 243.882 240.06
choco-solver 5a (2017-08-18) (complete)4284300SAT (TO)115 251.62399 240.02499
sat4j-CSP 2017-07-05 (complete)4258007? (TO) 256.81201 88.865601
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-07-26) (complete)4254528Wrong Opt.104 858.354 143.65601

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 91
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] x[9] x[10] x[11] </list> <values> 0 1 4 9 26 41 55 61 68 79 89 91
</values> </instantiation>