2017 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Scheduling/Scheduling-os-taillard/
Taillard-os-04-04-8.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameScheduling/Scheduling-os-taillard/
Taillard-os-04-04-8.xml
MD5SUMaed9643ac8b54e4586138aa43d9c539b
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark261
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.20433301
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables68
Number of constraints60
Number of domains6
Minimum domain size4
Maximum domain size361
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":4,"count":32},{"size":361,"count":36}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree5
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":20},{"degree":3,"count":32},{"degree":5,"count":16}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity6
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":4},{"arity":2,"count":16},{"arity":3,"count":16},{"arity":4,"count":8},{"arity":6,"count":16}]
Number of extensional constraints16
Number of intensional constraints20
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":16},{"type":"intension","count":20},{"type":"allDifferent","count":4},{"type":"noOverlap","count":4},{"type":"element","count":16}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin MAXIMUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2017-07-28 (complete)4259258OPT261 0.20433301 0.29397699
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2017-07-26 (complete)4256276OPT261 2.5552199 1.32989
OscaR - Hybrid 2017-07-26 (complete)4256773OPT261 2.7492099 1.42858
AbsCon-basic 2017-06-11 (complete)4257767OPT261 6.0433002 4.3147702
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-18) (complete)4283135OPT261 6.4493899 2.3124399
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-07-26) (complete)4254288OPT261 6.8222599 2.5773399
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-09) (complete)4270385OPT261 7.0730901 2.64991
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-08-22 (complete)4286075OPT261 10.8285 2.7722499
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-07-26 (complete)4257270OPT261 12.1351 3.0455301
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-09) (complete)4271855OPT261 16.358299 2.71347
Concrete 3.4 (complete)4259755OPT261 16.610001 8.29352
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-07-26) (complete)4254785OPT261 17.1611 2.9349401
choco-solver 5a (2017-07-26) (complete)4255282OPT261 17.5776 6.5497298
choco-solver 5a (2017-08-18) (complete)4284605OPT261 17.641701 6.2374201
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-18) (complete)4281665OPT261 18.237801 2.9932799
OscaR - ALNS 2017-07-26 (complete)4255779SAT (TO)261 250.103 240.02499
cosoco-sat 1.12 (complete)4266984? (NS) 0.023063 0.0240109
cosoco 1.1 (complete)4258761? (NS) 0.023367999 0.0713121
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4268915? (NS) 0.02372 0.123395
sat4j-CSP 2017-07-05 (complete)4258264? (TO) 263.76999 240.239

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 261
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="261"> <list> s[0][0] s[0][1] s[0][2] s[0][3] s[1][0] s[1][1] s[1][2] s[1][3] s[2][0] s[2][1] s[2][2]
s[2][3] s[3][0] s[3][1] s[3][2] s[3][3] e[0] e[1] e[2] e[3] d[0][0] d[0][1] d[0][2] d[0][3] d[1][0] d[1][1] d[1][2] d[1][3] d[2][0] d[2][1]
d[2][2] d[2][3] d[3][0] d[3][1] d[3][2] d[3][3] w[0][0] w[0][1] w[0][2] w[0][3] w[1][0] w[1][1] w[1][2] w[1][3] w[2][0] w[2][1] w[2][2]
w[2][3] w[3][0] w[3][1] w[3][2] w[3][3] sd[0][0] sd[0][1] sd[0][2] sd[0][3] sd[1][0] sd[1][1] sd[1][2] sd[1][3] sd[2][0] sd[2][1] sd[2][2]
sd[2][3] sd[3][0] sd[3][1] sd[3][2] sd[3][3] </list> <values> 0 63 135 210 0 72 158 179 0 63 165 210 0 72 165 179 256 245 242 261 59 62 71
46 69 63 21 66 63 95 45 32 72 93 11 82 2 0 1 3 3 1 2 0 0 2 3 1 1 3 0 2 63 135 0 210 179 72 158 0 0 210 63 165 165 0 179 72 </values>
</instantiation>