2017 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track (sequential and parallel solvers): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Scheduling/Scheduling-os-taillard/
Taillard-os-04-04-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameScheduling/Scheduling-os-taillard/
Taillard-os-04-04-3.xml
MD5SUMd594ce2470bfcbe7ad5c857fb9f8254a
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark250
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.230483
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables68
Number of constraints60
Number of domains6
Minimum domain size4
Maximum domain size350
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":4,"count":32},{"size":350,"count":36}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree5
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":20},{"degree":3,"count":32},{"degree":5,"count":16}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity6
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":4},{"arity":2,"count":16},{"arity":3,"count":16},{"arity":4,"count":8},{"arity":6,"count":16}]
Number of extensional constraints16
Number of intensional constraints20
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":16},{"type":"intension","count":20},{"type":"allDifferent","count":4},{"type":"noOverlap","count":4},{"type":"element","count":16}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin MAXIMUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2017-07-28 (complete)4259256OPT250 0.230483 0.31145301
OscaR - Hybrid 2017-07-26 (complete)4256771OPT250 3.0534699 1.82472
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2017-07-26 (complete)4256274OPT250 3.10145 2.5836301
AbsCon-basic 2017-06-11 (complete)4257765OPT250 5.7823501 3.71136
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-09) (complete)4270383OPT250 6.4439101 2.6252601
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-07-26) (complete)4254286OPT250 6.44486 2.4251001
choco-solver 4.0.5 seq (2017-08-18) (complete)4283133OPT250 6.75879 2.4167199
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-07-26 (complete)4257268OPT250 10.0997 2.72576
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-09) (complete)4271853OPT250 11.5294 2.09289
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2017-08-22 (complete)4286073OPT250 11.9876 2.83762
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-07-26) (complete)4254783OPT250 14.9637 2.7305701
Concrete 3.4 (complete)4259753OPT250 15.1039 6.9085398
choco-solver 4.0.5 par (2017-08-18) (complete)4281663OPT250 15.6451 2.6466899
choco-solver 5a (2017-08-18) (complete)4284603OPT250 16.9354 6.01685
choco-solver 5a (2017-07-26) (complete)4255280OPT250 20.8913 7.23492
OscaR - ALNS 2017-07-26 (complete)4255777SAT (TO)250 249.56599 240.01601
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4268913? (NS) 0.022806 0.079313897
cosoco-sat 1.12 (complete)4266982? (NS) 0.022984 0.0239491
cosoco 1.1 (complete)4258759? (NS) 0.023514001 0.10628
sat4j-CSP 2017-07-05 (complete)4258262? (TO) 261.79401 240.252

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 250
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="250"> <list> s[0][0] s[0][1] s[0][2] s[0][3] s[1][0] s[1][1] s[1][2] s[1][3] s[2][0] s[2][1] s[2][2]
s[2][3] s[3][0] s[3][1] s[3][2] s[3][3] e[0] e[1] e[2] e[3] d[0][0] d[0][1] d[0][2] d[0][3] d[1][0] d[1][1] d[1][2] d[1][3] d[2][0] d[2][1]
d[2][2] d[2][3] d[3][0] d[3][1] d[3][2] d[3][3] w[0][0] w[0][1] w[0][2] w[0][3] w[1][0] w[1][1] w[1][2] w[1][3] w[2][0] w[2][1] w[2][2]
w[2][3] w[3][0] w[3][1] w[3][2] w[3][3] sd[0][0] sd[0][1] sd[0][2] sd[0][3] sd[1][0] sd[1][1] sd[1][2] sd[1][3] sd[2][0] sd[2][1] sd[2][2]
sd[2][3] sd[3][0] sd[3][1] sd[3][2] sd[3][3] </list> <values> 0 43 117 190 0 40 138 171 0 40 138 190 0 43 128 190 209 246 248 250 35 60 54
19 40 98 25 75 28 88 52 58 43 74 62 60 3 0 2 1 1 3 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 2 1 3 43 190 117 0 138 0 171 40 190 40 0 138 0 128 43 190 </values>
</instantiation>