MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-27_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-27_ext.xml
MD5SUM6d488f56284b737344d331275a76980b
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMSAT TO
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3600.02
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115028MSAT (TO)2 3600.02 3689.04
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115024MSAT (TO)2 3600.02 3629.72
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115023MSAT (TO)2 3600.05 3696.82
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115027MSAT (TO)2 3600.07 3627.53
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115026MSAT (TO)4 1595.39 4000.04
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115025MSAT (TO)4 2279.15 4000.06
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115029? (exit code) 17.0884 17.1852
toulbar2 2008-06-271115030? (TO) 3600.01 3700.91

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
88 160 141 5 99 159 70 44 7 103 143 26 163 70 7 133 80 34 54 42 122 144 92 101 171 102 143 124 178 160 170 140 175 56 179 24 166 41 155 177