MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-43_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-43_ext.xml
MD5SUM5e74acd6c2922631caf76186e9c1ffd6
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark467.888
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114947OPTIMUM1 467.888 470.796
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114948OPTIMUM1 2241.34 2252.34
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114943MSAT (TO)1 3600.06 3605.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114944MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3613.82
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114945MSAT (TO)3 1601.09 4000.05
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114946MSAT (TO)3 3265.52 4000.11
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114949? (exit code) 17.0094 17.1571
toulbar2 2008-06-271114950? (TO) 3600.01 3610.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
147 4 179 116 29 176 74 88 179 48 10 115 170 27 25 129 164 95 131 10 147 176 67 140 36 75 176 44 145 104 142 11 66 73 47 171 146 157 28 152