MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-37_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-37_ext.xml
MD5SUMab3553351ec8972fad25e17e705701ed
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark365.643
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints135
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size40
Number of constraints which are defined in extension135
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114894OPTIMUM1 365.643 367.151
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114891OPTIMUM1 959.512 963.94
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114893OPTIMUM1 1213.88 1224.33
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114892OPTIMUM1 1778.64 1780.12
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114887MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3619.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114888MSAT (TO)1 3600.05 3610.72
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114890MSAT (TO)2 1594.75 4000.16
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114889MSAT (TO)2 1608.28 4000.27

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
12 0 20 15 28 33 8 29 1 14 30 36 16 26 29 23 3 32 15 12 18 12 12 29 7 6 9 7 38 32 25 1 10 10 4 22 35 11 16 26