MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-25/
normalized-composed-75-1-25-4_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-25/
normalized-composed-75-1-25-4_ext.xml
MD5SUM4ad1ca743a645c58d80f109c05bf2d54
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.12883
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints647
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension647
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114630OPTIMUM2 1.12883 1.14312
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114627OPTIMUM2 4.12037 4.66607
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114629OPTIMUM2 6.25805 6.34237
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114628OPTIMUM2 7.65683 8.75589
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114625OPTIMUM2 78.849 147.057
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114626MSAT (TO)2 1593.82 4000.09
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114624MSAT (TO)2 3600.02 3642.22
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114623MSAT (TO)2 3600.05 3601.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
7 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 5 5 7 2 4 2 3 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 3 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 0 4 4 6 1 0 6 2 7 7 5 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 3 5 1 4 1 0 3 1 1 6 0
0 6 0 2 1 8 8 2 3 1 1 3 0