MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-25-1-80/
normalized-composed-25-1-80-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-25-1-80/
normalized-composed-25-1-80-8_ext.xml
MD5SUM2ba98a840a9a02d73e44cd6cf680c46b
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.111982
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables33
Number of constraints302
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension302
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114542OPTIMUM2 0.111982 0.112914
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114541OPTIMUM2 0.370943 0.371139
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114539OPTIMUM2 2.81957 3.08018
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114540OPTIMUM2 3.84342 4.27512
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114537OPTIMUM2 75.7845 141.263
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114538MSAT (TO)2 1574.42 4000.08
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114535MSAT (TO)2 3600.03 3620.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114536MSAT (TO)2 3600.05 3655.83

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 3 5 1 0 3 1 1 3 3 0 9 7 3 0 4 7 3 2 5 2 6 7 9 9