MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-40_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-40_ext.xml
MD5SUM608e629c79e33bd31b2fe99ff5c8dad4
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark888.34
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114477OPTIMUM1 870.234 877.004
toulbar2 2008-06-271114478OPTIMUM1 888.34 896.019
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114475OPTIMUM1 1423.78 1437.56
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114476OPTIMUM1 3008.07 3022.3
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114473MSAT (TO)1 1584.35 4000.07
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114474MSAT (TO)1 1584.46 4000.07
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114471MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3632.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114472MSAT (TO)1 3600.09 3610.13

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
8 9 1 12 12 10 10 0 1 7 1 2 7 6 5 4 11 3 8 4 4 5 15 12 1 13 12 9 2 11 5 0 1 12 0 5 8 10 4 5