MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-95_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-95_ext.xml
MD5SUM30120e1e0dbdae946075a1e5c63aa8f1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark888.841
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114436OPTIMUM1 888.841 897.089
toulbar2 2008-06-271114438OPTIMUM1 893.181 899.354
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114435OPTIMUM1 1180.28 1191.6
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114437OPTIMUM1 1720.37 1727.13
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114433MSAT (TO)1 1574.52 4000.06
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114434MSAT (TO)1 1582.02 4000.05
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114431MSAT (TO)1 3600.06 3615.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114432MSAT (TO)1 3600.07 3601.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
3 9 14 3 7 7 1 15 7 13 12 9 3 0 0 14 15 11 2 15 9 2 13 7 3 13 1 9 9 7 1 9 11 14 12 2 15 11 9 14