MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-7_ext.xml
MD5SUM62591c7ac45dd2ea33dbbfa4d36cbcfc
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1329.01
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114428OPTIMUM1 1329.01 1340.52
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114429OPTIMUM1 1460.22 1463.73
toulbar2 2008-06-271114430OPTIMUM1 1665.09 1672.2
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114427OPTIMUM1 2129.1 2133.59
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114426MSAT (TO)1 1567.23 4000.08
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114425MSAT (TO)1 1597.15 4000.06
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114424MSAT (TO)1 3600 3631.32
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114423MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3623.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
9 7 14 5 13 12 11 15 9 10 12 10 2 14 13 9 8 8 10 1 3 7 14 9 8 10 2 1 7 12 1 0 15 8 13 11 15 11 1 12