MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.2/
normalized-rand-2-40-11-414-200-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.2/
normalized-rand-2-40-11-414-200-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM6e657ff108e5761d4e7470667137953c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark648.756
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints414
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size11
Number of constraints which are defined in extension414
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114228OPTIMUM1 648.756 652.889
toulbar2 2008-06-271114230OPTIMUM1 2367.75 2385.77
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114229OPTIMUM1 2418.46 2439.08
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114227OPTIMUM1 2439.28 2456.17
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114226MSAT (TO)1 1601.04 4000.07
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114225MSAT (TO)1 1604.93 4000.05
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114224MSAT (TO)1 3600 3633.82
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114223MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3621.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
8 7 0 6 10 10 1 1 7 6 2 5 8 3 2 1 7 2 1 9 6 6 2 2 3 2 10 8 7 7 9 8 4 8 5 6 4 2 10 9