MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-7.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-7.xml
MD5SUM5175a62a7f0389e4017b8b12a04e7310
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.71759
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity22
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1109205OPTIMUM1 2.71759 3.11744
Sugar v1.13+minisat1109206OPTIMUM1 3.06053 3.36898
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301109201MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3618.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301109202MSAT (TO)2 3600.06 3601.72
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1109203MSAT (TO)4 3600.08 3616.63
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1109204MSAT (TO)4 3600.12 3612.04

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
4 2 4 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 4 0 1 3 4 4 4 0 1 1 4 0 4 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 4 4 4 2 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 2
1 0 4 4 4 3 1 3 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 3 3 4 0 1 1 2 2 0 2 4 4 4 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 2 1 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 4 3 4
3 4 0 4 4 0 3 4 1 2 0 0 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 1 4 4 4 2 0