CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-20_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-20_ext.xml
MD5SUMcb7d8676a41f7265d6f5813b38ba998f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.79973
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131102987UNSAT 1.79973 1.84006
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102976UNSAT 1.80572 1.82147
Mistral-option 1.3141102986UNSAT 1.92071 1.94151
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102977UNSAT 2.04069 2.06114
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102974UNSAT 4.07038 4.13773
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102982UNSAT 15.0757 15.2623
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102983UNSAT 15.1267 15.3221
spider 2008-06-141102975UNSAT 22.1966 22.6424
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107230UNSAT 38.2192 38.605
galac E1102985UNSAT 38.5411 38.8689
galac M1102984UNSAT 46.9389 47.4192
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102978UNSAT 61.5716 62.0834
Abscon 112v4 AC1102990UNSAT 95.9424 97.0191
cpHydra k_401102993UNSAT 98.887 99.2108
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102991UNSAT 99.6259 100.631
cpHydra k_101102992UNSAT 99.8638 100.209
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102979UNSAT 117.865 119.09
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102980UNSAT 152.468 154.035
casper zao1102988UNSAT 241.889 244.053
bpsolver 2008-06-271102981UNSAT 258.453 258.581
casper zito1102989UNSAT 310.059 313.033
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102973? (TO) 1800.06 1813.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102972? (TO) 1800.09 1815.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: