CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-6_ext.xml
MD5SUMc1d4c718bd859caaf3561d3b5110e860
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark4.67529
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints753
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension753
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131102745UNSAT 4.67529 4.72224
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102734UNSAT 4.71928 4.725
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102735UNSAT 4.73828 4.76122
Mistral-option 1.3141102744UNSAT 4.74028 4.76146
bpsolver 2008-06-271102739UNSAT 6.89995 6.96399
cpHydra k_101102750UNSAT 11.1813 11.3233
cpHydra k_401102751UNSAT 12.4371 12.7264
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102740UNSAT 14.1558 14.2074
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102741UNSAT 14.5598 14.6934
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102749UNSAT 17.7523 17.8805
Abscon 112v4 AC1102748UNSAT 17.7703 17.9745
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102732UNSAT 21.5367 21.671
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102738UNSAT 38.8901 39.3299
galac E1102743UNSAT 41.1717 41.6044
spider 2008-06-141102733UNSAT 43.9383 44.1184
galac M1102742UNSAT 46.9279 47.6817
casper zito1102747UNSAT 86.7888 87.4595
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102737UNSAT 110.877 111.836
casper zao1102746UNSAT 131.167 133.131
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107159UNSAT 158.921 160.492
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102736UNSAT 690.018 695.137
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102731? (TO) 1800.05 1822.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102730? (TO) 1800.05 1801.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: