CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-94_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-94_ext.xml
MD5SUMdf20c7367ecd48e6e4a3b5fcb67ad1ec
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark4.06738
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints753
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension753
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102646UNSAT 4.06738 4.08279
Mistral-option 1.3141102656UNSAT 4.42033 4.46371
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102647UNSAT 4.5823 4.63241
Mistral-prime 1.3131102657UNSAT 4.78227 4.8105
bpsolver 2008-06-271102651UNSAT 6.89995 6.96227
cpHydra k_101102662UNSAT 11.2493 11.3479
cpHydra k_401102663UNSAT 12.6031 12.898
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102652UNSAT 13.8029 13.8045
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102653UNSAT 13.9419 13.9997
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102661UNSAT 15.9416 16.1905
Abscon 112v4 AC1102660UNSAT 17.1284 17.3407
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102650UNSAT 17.9273 18.1846
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102644UNSAT 18.9471 19.2541
spider 2008-06-141102645UNSAT 43.9313 43.9498
galac E1102655UNSAT 49.3235 49.594
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102649UNSAT 50.4883 50.8474
galac M1102654UNSAT 67.7827 68.3395
casper zito1102659UNSAT 82.3665 82.7785
casper zao1102658UNSAT 113.346 114.34
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107165UNSAT 145.651 147.09
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102648UNSAT 424.975 425.428
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102642? (TO) 1800.02 1801.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102643? (TO) 1800.1 1807.33

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: