CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-40-19-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-fcd-22_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-40-19-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-fcd-22_ext.xml
MD5SUMac763b3ae8565455c2a92c96a9db7d59
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.834872
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints341
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size19
Number of constraints which are defined in extension341
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271101370SAT 0.834872 0.854051
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301101366SAT 3.99339 4.06271
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301101368SAT 6.86196 7.05649
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271101371SAT 9.2226 9.40696
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1101385SAT 16.8554 17.039
Mistral-option 1.3141101380SAT 21.9807 22.175
Mistral-prime 1.3131101381SAT 22.4056 22.5004
Abscon 112v4 AC1101384SAT 24.3793 24.5181
cpHydra k_101101386SAT 30.9963 31.3842
cpHydra k_401101387SAT 31.2862 31.5459
spider 2008-06-141101369SAT 79.198 79.8139
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261101376SAT 80.7947 81.0645
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261101377SAT 82.8344 83.163
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106705SAT 124.757 125.194
Sugar v1.13+picosat1101373SAT 219.342 221.484
bpsolver 2008-06-271101375SAT 248.633 250.559
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131101372SAT 696.188 701.308
Sugar v1.13+minisat1101374SAT 1112 1123.6
casper zito1101383SAT 1352.74 1355.99
galac E1101379? (TO) 1800.01 1817.31
galac M1101378? (TO) 1800.05 1801.11
casper zao1101382? (TO) 1800.09 1805.51
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301101367? (TO) 1800.09 1817.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
2 5 0 16 4 4 4 15 5 14 7 4 5 11 9 18 1 4 2 12 14 0 3 10 7 0 14 9 17 0 9 16 14 1 17 10 18 17 2 6