CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-93_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-93_ext.xml
MD5SUM891b7ac12db688afc51d70a7c6a04c31
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.84887
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271100601UNSAT 0.84887 0.853695
Mistral-prime 1.3131100611UNSAT 0.944855 0.956635
cpHydra k_101100616UNSAT 0.954854 0.978391
cpHydra k_401100617UNSAT 0.98185 0.991661
MDG-probe 2008-06-271100600UNSAT 1.77873 1.80214
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301100598UNSAT 3.68644 3.73989
Mistral-option 1.3141100610UNSAT 3.88341 3.92364
spider 2008-06-141100599UNSAT 13.337 13.4727
Abscon 112v4 AC1100614UNSAT 15.8006 15.9842
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1100615UNSAT 15.9026 16.1117
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131100602UNSAT 16.0676 16.2645
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107275UNSAT 20.2799 20.3706
Sugar v1.13+minisat1100604UNSAT 20.8398 20.9213
Sugar v1.13+picosat1100603UNSAT 26.419 26.7255
galac M1100608UNSAT 26.6389 26.7699
galac E1100609UNSAT 42.2646 42.6654
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261100606UNSAT 47.3688 47.8001
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261100607UNSAT 47.4308 47.9484
casper zito1100613UNSAT 274.433 277.052
casper zao1100612UNSAT 296.629 299.184
bpsolver 2008-06-271100605UNSAT 540.106 544
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301100596? (TO) 1800 1806.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301100597? (TO) 1800.02 1800.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: