CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-2_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-2_ext.xml
MD5SUM3f54aac156e01bc9d1a303b6d2aeb902
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.90041
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131100523UNSAT 3.90041 3.92316
MDG-probe 2008-06-271100512UNSAT 4.27635 4.31133
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271100513UNSAT 4.39033 4.44049
Mistral-option 1.3141100522UNSAT 6.10507 6.16502
Abscon 112v4 AC1100526UNSAT 6.64899 6.71679
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1100527UNSAT 6.80796 6.90253
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301100510UNSAT 8.66668 8.78486
cpHydra k_401100529UNSAT 14.9317 15.3439
cpHydra k_101100528UNSAT 14.9737 15.3036
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261100518UNSAT 74.1047 74.2993
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261100519UNSAT 79.6349 80.4436
spider 2008-06-141100511UNSAT 92.6489 93.4907
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131100514UNSAT 97.3622 98.3058
galac E1100521UNSAT 125.894 127.164
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107258UNSAT 183.602 184.591
Sugar v1.13+minisat1100516UNSAT 211.8 213.587
Sugar v1.13+picosat1100515UNSAT 260.523 263.152
galac M1100520UNSAT 311.435 314.474
casper zao1100524UNSAT 1291.26 1295.13
casper zito1100525UNSAT 1303.36 1307.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301100508? (TO) 1800.07 1801.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301100509? (TO) 1800.08 1809.32
bpsolver 2008-06-271100517? (TO) 1800.08 1807.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: