CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-40_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-40_ext.xml
MD5SUMa91b122166d09430f4c9a44f5a97b7f6
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.52516
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131100259UNSAT 5.52516 5.57917
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271100249UNSAT 5.9511 6.00969
MDG-probe 2008-06-271100248UNSAT 6.48801 6.55284
Mistral-option 1.3141100258UNSAT 9.10762 9.18918
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301100246UNSAT 12.2781 12.4201
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261100255UNSAT 126.404 126.513
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261100254UNSAT 137.608 138.948
spider 2008-06-141100247UNSAT 156.628 158.075
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1100263UNSAT 158.754 158.881
Abscon 112v4 AC1100262UNSAT 160.064 160.149
cpHydra k_101100264UNSAT 181.952 182.957
cpHydra k_401100265UNSAT 181.968 182.37
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107260UNSAT 285.834 288.604
galac E1100257UNSAT 425.151 429.04
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131100250UNSAT 731.147 734.787
Sugar v1.13+picosat1100251UNSAT 732.718 739.823
Sugar v1.13+minisat1100252UNSAT 750.8 752.815
galac M1100256? (TO) 1800 1805.51
bpsolver 2008-06-271100253? (TO) 1800.03 1817.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301100244? (TO) 1800.07 1813.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301100245? (TO) 1800.07 1806.92
casper zao1100260? (TO) 1800.08 1805.71
casper zito1100261? (TO) 1800.08 1805.71

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: