CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-13_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-13_ext.xml
MD5SUM96a469d9fbfaeb127e293157d68f09e7
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark4.09138
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints135
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size40
Number of constraints which are defined in extension135
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131100237UNSAT 4.09138 4.09334
MDG-probe 2008-06-271100226UNSAT 4.21636 4.2565
Mistral-option 1.3141100236UNSAT 4.22636 4.26587
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271100227UNSAT 4.41233 4.45694
Abscon 112v4 AC1100240UNSAT 7.34588 7.44407
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1100241UNSAT 7.55385 7.66049
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301100224UNSAT 9.43057 9.45148
cpHydra k_401100243UNSAT 11.1503 11.3579
cpHydra k_101100242UNSAT 14.7068 15.0389
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261100233UNSAT 31.3302 31.6724
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261100232UNSAT 31.5332 31.8827
spider 2008-06-141100225UNSAT 39.393 39.5482
galac E1100235UNSAT 123.939 124.475
Sugar v1.13+minisat1100230UNSAT 145.376 146.835
bpsolver 2008-06-271100231UNSAT 154.653 155.975
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107212UNSAT 162.305 162.418
Sugar v1.13+picosat1100229UNSAT 169.924 170.778
galac M1100234UNSAT 265.701 266.895
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131100228UNSAT 321.811 324.611
casper zao1100238UNSAT 775.698 779.322
casper zito1100239UNSAT 971.086 978.099
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301100223? (TO) 1800.05 1801.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301100222? (TO) 1800.08 1811.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: