CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-31_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-31_ext.xml
MD5SUM6b36a5769dabab67c09f820b688479b7
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.098984
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints222
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension222
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
spider 2008-06-141099587SAT 0.098984 0.103229
Mistral-option 1.3141099598SAT 0.107983 0.114747
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099589SAT 0.136978 0.144621
cpHydra k_401099605SAT 0.575912 0.577281
Mistral-prime 1.3131099599SAT 0.608906 0.616754
cpHydra k_101099604SAT 0.616905 0.628424
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099588SAT 0.652899 0.654635
casper zito1099601SAT 0.703892 0.715798
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099586SAT 0.858869 0.916968
bpsolver 2008-06-271099593SAT 1.14283 1.15761
casper zao1099600SAT 1.38379 1.40039
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099595SAT 2.97155 3.02746
Abscon 112v4 AC1099602SAT 3.04953 3.08492
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099603SAT 3.20251 3.29123
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099594SAT 3.3115 3.39644
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099590SAT 3.47447 3.5294
galac E1099597SAT 3.51047 3.66699
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099592SAT 3.65944 3.75416
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099591SAT 4.01139 4.13674
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106668SAT 4.25735 4.31466
galac M1099596SAT 4.98224 5.07629
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099584SAT 5.2312 5.30206
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099585? (TO) 1800.09 1805.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
12 11 9 5 3 4 4 9 1 0 1 9 9 0 9 10 12 14 4 7 2 1 9 0 11 4 10 10 8 5