CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-1_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-1_ext.xml
MD5SUMfb962e9cebb6dc6265bb92f0d9b96b34
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.283956
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints225
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension225
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099522SAT 0.283956 0.291511
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099523SAT 0.58391 0.590994
Mistral-option 1.3141099532SAT 0.59091 0.602402
Mistral-prime 1.3131099533SAT 0.601908 0.606671
cpHydra k_401099539SAT 0.617905 0.625343
cpHydra k_101099538SAT 0.623904 0.636618
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099518SAT 1.07983 1.11903
bpsolver 2008-06-271099527SAT 1.16882 1.1808
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099529SAT 1.37679 1.40373
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099528SAT 1.51277 1.57157
Abscon 112v4 AC1099536SAT 1.87671 1.92672
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099537SAT 1.88871 1.94808
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099520SAT 2.00769 2.05433
galac E1099531SAT 2.45563 2.55889
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099526SAT 2.6076 2.67984
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099525SAT 2.92555 3.04141
spider 2008-06-141099521SAT 5.2612 5.28323
galac M1099530SAT 6.21206 6.30203
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106661SAT 6.95094 7.08601
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099524SAT 8.82866 8.83807
casper zito1099535SAT 13.6699 13.7922
casper zao1099534SAT 14.8867 15.029
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099519? (TO) 1800.01 1802.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 9 0 3 14 4 14 1 13 13 4 9 7 3 12 4 2 12 6 14 11 2 10 14 14 14 13 8 12 2