CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-19_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-19_ext.xml
MD5SUM33a8db219bdf4a848e6d94a1a6a6398e
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.061989
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099435SAT 0.061989 0.0697229
Mistral-prime 1.3131099445SAT 0.068988 0.074321
cpHydra k_101099450SAT 0.080987 0.086973
cpHydra k_401099451SAT 0.081986 0.0881431
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099434SAT 0.268958 0.275553
Mistral-option 1.3141099444SAT 0.302953 0.307781
spider 2008-06-141099433SAT 0.371942 0.384011
casper zito1099447SAT 0.45293 0.45904
bpsolver 2008-06-271099439SAT 0.485925 0.49188
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099432SAT 0.940856 0.965377
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099440SAT 0.941856 0.997899
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099449SAT 0.954854 0.990354
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099441SAT 1.04384 1.1034
Abscon 112v4 AC1099448SAT 1.20981 1.25497
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099437SAT 1.3148 1.45705
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099430SAT 1.76873 1.79371
galac E1099443SAT 2.68259 2.80074
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106660SAT 4.24835 4.33676
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099438SAT 4.77127 4.92708
casper zao1099446SAT 5.61515 5.64063
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099436SAT 6.88095 6.85289
galac M1099442SAT 11.5612 11.7687
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099431? (TO) 1800.01 1814.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
13 10 6 8 8 13 9 4 7 12 3 6 12 2 12 11 12 13 3 5 0 5 4 8 13 2 1 11 6 3