CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-41_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-41_ext.xml
MD5SUM700fc9098bff77dc02d4c23e80ef998f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.182971
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099413SAT 0.182971 0.194274
Mistral-option 1.3141099422SAT 0.199969 0.206445
Mistral-prime 1.3131099423SAT 0.269958 0.277363
cpHydra k_401099429SAT 0.285955 0.292003
cpHydra k_101099428SAT 0.289955 0.301281
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099409SAT 0.630904 0.685602
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099412SAT 0.790879 0.798789
bpsolver 2008-06-271099417SAT 0.878865 0.880232
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099408SAT 0.97685 0.99873
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099416SAT 1.17482 1.27829
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099415SAT 2.16667 2.32815
Abscon 112v4 AC1099426SAT 2.94955 2.96691
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099427SAT 3.15452 3.2417
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099419SAT 3.2685 3.28852
galac M1099420SAT 3.40948 3.46781
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099410SAT 3.50247 3.55949
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099418SAT 3.55946 3.60259
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106671SAT 4.15037 4.19786
casper zito1099425SAT 4.72328 4.77632
galac E1099421SAT 5.35119 5.46071
casper zao1099424SAT 5.82611 5.86873
spider 2008-06-141099411SAT 8.47571 8.54604
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099414SAT 11.8632 12.0017

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
7 7 6 9 9 5 7 8 10 5 0 11 1 6 1 7 1 9 14 3 6 2 8 3 5 10 0 8 9 8