CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-9_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-9_ext.xml
MD5SUM80848838b19d7b6fa9d9600e4c098b52
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.274958
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints227
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension227
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098862SAT 0.274958 0.281693
Mistral-prime 1.3131098873SAT 0.371943 0.383262
cpHydra k_101098878SAT 0.380941 0.405417
Mistral-option 1.3141098872SAT 0.383941 0.395735
cpHydra k_401098879SAT 0.38594 0.3986
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098863SAT 0.405937 0.417866
casper zao1098874SAT 0.98085 0.99108
bpsolver 2008-06-271098867SAT 1.15082 1.16657
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098866SAT 1.2948 1.41386
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098858SAT 1.53877 1.56924
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098860SAT 1.76473 1.83368
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098877SAT 1.84072 1.871
Abscon 112v4 AC1098876SAT 1.92671 1.92741
spider 2008-06-141098861SAT 2.21866 2.24708
galac E1098871SAT 2.54261 2.66458
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098868SAT 2.76458 2.81181
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098869SAT 3.03954 3.08049
casper zito1098875SAT 3.09953 3.13607
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098865SAT 4.47332 4.64353
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098864SAT 5.53116 5.54464
galac M1098870SAT 12.879 13.3382
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106697SAT 15.9016 16.0711
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098859? (TO) 1800.04 1801.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
5 1 9 12 5 3 12 4 12 8 0 13 1 0 10 12 4 11 4 2 1 4 1 1 9 6 2 0 3 10