CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-40-19/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-2_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-40-19/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-2_ext.xml
MD5SUM2d637fad3bd728de488176247090b3e8
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark87.7047
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints330
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size19
Number of constraints which are defined in extension330
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141098432UNSAT 87.7047 87.7519
Mistral-prime 1.3131098433UNSAT 87.7187 87.9929
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098423UNSAT 93.1148 93.9137
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098422UNSAT 93.4928 94.2986
cpHydra k_101098438UNSAT 100.157 101.246
bpsolver 2008-06-271098427UNSAT 112.184 112.662
cpHydra k_401098439UNSAT 212.49 213.774
Abscon 112v4 AC1098436UNSAT 216.601 217.274
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098437UNSAT 225.284 227.453
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098420UNSAT 264.354 265.449
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098429UNSAT 385.617 386.186
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098428UNSAT 420.058 423.705
galac M1098430? (TO) 1800 1808.91
galac E1098431? (TO) 1800.01 1816.21
casper zao1098434? (TO) 1800.03 1810.81
spider 2008-06-141098421? (TO) 1800.03 1815.31
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098418? (TO) 1800.07 1800.92
casper zito1098435? (TO) 1800.09 1804.81
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098419? (TO) 1800.1 1800.82
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098426? (TO) 1800.12 1812.83
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106735? (TO) 1800.12 1812.31
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098424? (TO) 1800.13 1813.19
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098425? (TO) 1800.13 1813.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: