CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-25/
normalized-composed-75-1-25-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-25/
normalized-composed-75-1-25-6_ext.xml
MD5SUM83a4fb3104d58651aaa920d50a0c48ce
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.048991
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints647
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension647
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098181UNSAT 0.048991 0.0575349
Mistral-prime 1.3131098191UNSAT 0.048992 0.0490651
Mistral-option 1.3141098190UNSAT 0.052991 0.0532341
cpHydra k_101098196UNSAT 0.06099 0.064143
cpHydra k_401098197UNSAT 0.063989 0.070263
casper zito1098193UNSAT 0.074987 0.0836961
spider 2008-06-141098179UNSAT 0.094984 0.104009
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098180UNSAT 0.165973 0.361409
casper zao1098192UNSAT 0.213966 0.22568
bpsolver 2008-06-271098185UNSAT 0.400938 0.413881
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105423UNSAT 0.659899 0.682443
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098178UNSAT 0.753884 0.806681
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098187UNSAT 0.771882 0.791639
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098186UNSAT 0.775881 0.781434
Abscon 112v4 AC1098194UNSAT 0.98285 1.04759
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098195UNSAT 0.999847 1.04385
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098184UNSAT 1.38179 1.48832
galac M1098188UNSAT 1.39379 1.42292
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098183UNSAT 1.39379 1.523
galac E1098189UNSAT 1.43278 1.46708
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098182UNSAT 2.30765 2.34677
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098177? (TO) 1800.04 1814.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098176? (TO) 1800.06 1807.23

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: