CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-40/
normalized-composed-75-1-40-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-40/
normalized-composed-75-1-40-6_ext.xml
MD5SUM20de3bf83d263861cf12e3a466a0406c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.047992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints662
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension662
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098005UNSAT 0.047992 0.057461
Mistral-prime 1.3131098015UNSAT 0.049991 0.05568
Mistral-option 1.3141098014UNSAT 0.059989 0.065378
cpHydra k_401098021UNSAT 0.060989 0.0687381
cpHydra k_101098020UNSAT 0.06099 0.067576
casper zito1098017UNSAT 0.075987 0.083914
spider 2008-06-141098003UNSAT 0.090985 0.0995771
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098004UNSAT 0.132979 0.138854
casper zao1098016UNSAT 0.222965 0.233184
bpsolver 2008-06-271098009UNSAT 0.401938 0.409418
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105433UNSAT 0.660898 0.67797
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098011UNSAT 0.753884 0.779986
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098002UNSAT 0.758884 0.80543
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098010UNSAT 0.830873 0.890497
Abscon 112v4 AC1098018UNSAT 0.944855 0.989913
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098019UNSAT 1.02684 1.09458
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098007UNSAT 1.26081 1.36079
galac M1098012UNSAT 1.38579 1.42085
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098008UNSAT 1.39679 1.55735
galac E1098013UNSAT 1.57676 1.6267
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098006UNSAT 2.51362 2.58001
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098000? (TO) 1800.01 1814.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098001? (TO) 1800.05 1800.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: