CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM86092f69b37d5c8f0d18926f72758257
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark8.83966
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097586UNSAT 8.83966 8.92289
Mistral-prime 1.3131097597UNSAT 9.14161 9.22363
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097587UNSAT 9.47756 9.5637
Mistral-option 1.3141097596UNSAT 9.62854 9.71665
bpsolver 2008-06-271097591UNSAT 15.2017 15.3352
cpHydra k_401097603UNSAT 16.6855 17.029
cpHydra k_101097602UNSAT 16.8694 20.1311
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097601UNSAT 22.8915 23.1226
Abscon 112v4 AC1097600UNSAT 23.5144 23.7707
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097584UNSAT 28.1587 28.476
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097592UNSAT 34.3428 34.5589
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097593UNSAT 36.9494 37.3367
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097590UNSAT 122.224 123.481
spider 2008-06-141097585UNSAT 129.149 130.374
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107182UNSAT 177.288 178.916
casper zito1097599UNSAT 178.588 179.075
galac E1097595UNSAT 179.181 180.924
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097589UNSAT 332.342 332.632
galac M1097594UNSAT 459.885 460.445
casper zao1097598UNSAT 492.308 496.811
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097588UNSAT 1384.29 1389.57
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097582? (TO) 1800.04 1816.32
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097583? (TO) 1800.05 1810.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: