CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-95_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-95_ext.xml
MD5SUM30120e1e0dbdae946075a1e5c63aa8f1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark14.8537
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097543UNSAT 14.8537 14.9168
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097542UNSAT 15.2567 15.3975
Mistral-prime 1.3131097553UNSAT 15.7326 15.8677
Mistral-option 1.3141097552UNSAT 17.6543 17.817
bpsolver 2008-06-271097547UNSAT 21.4667 21.5577
cpHydra k_101097558UNSAT 21.6017 21.7078
cpHydra k_401097559UNSAT 23.3874 23.8004
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097557UNSAT 46.265 46.7042
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097540UNSAT 51.4482 51.7269
Abscon 112v4 AC1097556UNSAT 58.926 59.5266
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097548UNSAT 59.048 59.3251
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097549UNSAT 63.9593 64.5662
spider 2008-06-141097541UNSAT 230.722 232.485
casper zito1097555UNSAT 318.027 319.133
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097546UNSAT 319.801 320.375
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107195UNSAT 396.441 399.069
casper zao1097554UNSAT 424.102 427.787
galac E1097551UNSAT 572.646 574.562
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097545UNSAT 780.711 784.555
galac M1097550UNSAT 1283.16 1283.8
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097539? (TO) 1800.04 1808.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097538? (TO) 1800.09 1807.22
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097544? (TO) 1800.15 1809.09

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: