CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-68_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-68_ext.xml
MD5SUM30cf42054144d08f23234760a7923d01
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.108982
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097213SAT 0.108982 0.115964
Mistral-prime 1.3131097223SAT 0.300954 0.30695
cpHydra k_401097229SAT 0.316951 0.322114
cpHydra k_101097228SAT 0.32395 0.341599
Mistral-option 1.3141097222SAT 0.600907 0.613019
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097212SAT 0.786879 0.797962
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097227SAT 0.91386 0.937241
Abscon 112v4 AC1097226SAT 1.03884 1.10903
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097210SAT 1.12883 1.15773
spider 2008-06-141097211SAT 1.17182 1.18648
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097208SAT 2.24866 2.31913
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097215SAT 2.74758 2.85597
bpsolver 2008-06-271097217SAT 2.87456 2.90409
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097216SAT 2.89756 3.02309
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097214SAT 3.3105 3.40874
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097219SAT 4.26735 4.32852
casper zito1097225SAT 4.6243 4.66974
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097218SAT 4.62529 4.69129
galac E1097221SAT 8.5517 8.4985
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107206SAT 9.8865 10.0379
casper zao1097224SAT 19.883 19.9851
galac M1097220SAT 38.0002 38.4212
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097209? (TO) 1800.02 1812.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
17 20 19 0 9 11 11 21 3 6 9 20 22 1 10 6 20 24 16 19 24 10 19 8 22 14 2 2 16 21 9 12 20 23 14 6 15 9 4 12