CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-7/
normalized-os-taillard-7-95-9.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-7/
normalized-os-taillard-7-95-9.xml
MD5SUMa9814aab0a64743442164ff9858cefcc
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.072988
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables49
Number of constraints294
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size378
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension294
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131094341UNSAT 0.072988 0.073652
bpsolver 2008-06-271094335UNSAT 0.092985 0.0996119
cpHydra k_101094346UNSAT 0.213967 0.219427
cpHydra k_401094347UNSAT 0.214966 0.221334
Mistral-option 1.3141094340UNSAT 0.240962 0.24596
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094331UNSAT 0.394939 0.401855
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094330UNSAT 0.578911 0.588065
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094336UNSAT 0.889864 0.942632
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094337UNSAT 0.917859 0.9608
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094334UNSAT 1.60675 1.70451
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094333UNSAT 3.13952 3.24801
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106197UNSAT 80.8537 81.6403
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094329UNSAT 543.774 544.012
galac M1094338? (MO) 992.17 998.113
galac E1094339? (MO) 1036.59 1044.41
casper zao1094342? (TO) 1800.03 1808.01
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094328? (TO) 1800.07 1800.82
casper zito1094343? (TO) 1800.07 1811.91
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094345? (TO) 1800.08 1812.76
Abscon 112v4 AC1094344? (TO) 1800.1 1806.94
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094327? (TO) 1800.1 1804.92
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094332? (TO) 1800.16 1806.8

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: