CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-10/
normalized-os-taillard-10-95-8.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-10/
normalized-os-taillard-10-95-8.xml
MD5SUM508e40f01241f86cee2b8848995da857
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.248961
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints900
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size565
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension900
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271094062UNSAT 0.248961 0.254225
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094063UNSAT 1.37079 1.41314
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094064UNSAT 1.52077 1.54961
cpHydra k_101094073UNSAT 8.96664 9.07956
cpHydra k_401094074UNSAT 9.14461 9.39019
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094057UNSAT 14.1209 14.2589
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094060UNSAT 14.2548 14.4668
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094061UNSAT 27.0429 27.4946
Mistral-prime 1.3131094068UNSAT 61.5586 61.5959
Mistral-option 1.3141094067UNSAT 91.2241 91.4205
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094058UNSAT 211.535 213.37
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094059? 279.905 280.77
galac E1094066? (problem) 59.5549 60.1506
galac M1094065? (problem) 59.9999 60.5929
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094055? (TO) 1800 1813.32
casper zao1094069? (TO) 1800.02 1804.71
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094054? (TO) 1800.03 1808.82
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094056? (TO) 1800.05 1804.62
casper zito1094070? (TO) 1800.06 1810.91
Abscon 112v4 AC1094071? (TO) 1800.09 1803.24
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106147? (TO) 1800.1 1808.41
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094072? (TO) 1800.16 1808.86

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: