CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pigeons/
normalized-pigeons-35.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pigeons/
normalized-pigeons-35.xml
MD5SUM281fe9629d6958abd144b323dc5f3a5c
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.023995
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables35
Number of constraints595
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size34
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension595
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271091313UNSAT 0.023995 0.0303101
MDG-probe 2008-06-271091312UNSAT 0.023995 0.0308081
Mistral-option 1.3141091322UNSAT 0.024995 0.030901
Mistral-prime 1.3131091323UNSAT 0.025995 0.031353
casper zito1091325UNSAT 0.033994 0.040253
cpHydra k_401091329UNSAT 0.035993 0.0426521
cpHydra k_101091328UNSAT 0.036994 0.042361
casper zao1091324UNSAT 0.053991 0.0626561
bpsolver 2008-06-271091317UNSAT 0.095985 0.102021
Abscon 112v4 AC1091326UNSAT 1.01484 1.04666
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1091327UNSAT 1.06184 1.09401
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261091318UNSAT 1.08683 1.12236
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261091319UNSAT 1.19382 1.26853
galac M1091320? (TO) 1800.02 1809.42
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301091311? (TO) 1800.02 1817.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301091309? (TO) 1800.03 1813.02
galac E1091321? (TO) 1800.03 1805.81
Sugar v1.13+minisat1091316? (TO) 1800.05 1802.72
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301091310? (TO) 1800.09 1800.92
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131091314? (TO) 1800.1 1802.59
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106205? (TO) 1800.11 1816.11
Sugar v1.13+picosat1091315? (TO) 1800.14 1822.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: